Acer Predator G3-710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-710(KBL)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 20:14
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 191
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 679
64% 533 Pts
64-Core 675
42% 675 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.5
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 63.1
53% 66.3 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 64
Splatting 55
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 380 393 382 214 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 400
Mixed 332
SusWrite 298
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 44.5
164% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 216
184% 267 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 99%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB Kingston ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 Kingston ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 24GB
2133, 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-710 Builds (Compare 2,887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: Acer Predator G3-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback