Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M3502QA_M3502QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M3502QA_M3502QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M3502QA
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220218
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 10:12
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 862
91% 726 Pts
64-Core 983
61% 983 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 122D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.36
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 24.6
13% 17.8 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 19.7
14% 15.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1269 586 84 82 87 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,732
Write 1,499
Mixed 1,138
SusWrite 366
264% 1,183 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 64.5
216% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 417
324% 443 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 179%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4AAG165WB-BCWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M3502QA_M3502QA Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M3502QA_M3502QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback