RM ONE VALUE ECOQUIET 211

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRM ONE VALUE ECOQUIET 211  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-I LX/RM/SI
Memory1.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130617
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 20:19
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$192
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 118
55% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 292
29% 237 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 45.8
47% 34.9 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 61
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,092
Write 1,868
Mixed 1,614
414% 1,858 MB/s
4K Read 125
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 43.6
278% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 211
141% 167 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
723GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 80 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 69.5
Write 58.8
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 77.4
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$33
7GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 61 57 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 48.7
Write 65.6
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 57.5
41% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
203GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 87 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 81.4
Write 89.6
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 87.3
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.2
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE VALUE ECOQUIET 211 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: RM ONE VALUE ECOQUIET 211

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $206
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback