Dell XPS 8930

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8930  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0DF42J
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220708
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 14:12
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 807
78% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,064
66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FFB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 189
Parallax 189
151% 188 fps
MRender 209
Gravity 164
Splatting 136
135% 170 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KXG50ZNV1T02 TOSHIBA 1024GB
788GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 42 52 100 159 223 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 1,589
Write 43.6
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 102
96% 454 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 26.3
83% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 31.2
DQ Mixed 80.5
108% 213 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
467GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 472 471 471 471 470 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 452
Write 413
Mixed 388
SusWrite 470
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 18.6
94% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 88.5
DQ Mixed 149
132% 206 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 133%
SDXC Card 128GB
107GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 24 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 16.7
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 23.4
30% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.2
83% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 24%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
495GB free, PID 0821
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 111 111 111 110 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 134
Write 127
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 108
125% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 53%
WD Elements 2621 5TB
871GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 93 94 94 93 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 106
Write 91.2
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 91.9
118% 89 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
646GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 136 136 136 136 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 149
Write 137
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 133
141% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378A1K43CB2-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 27.4
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 27.1
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8930 Builds (Compare 6,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Dell XPS 8930

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $292
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback