Asus BM5242(BM5342,BM5642)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAsus BM5242(BM5342,BM5642)  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM5242(BM5342,BM5642)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111227
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 08:46
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5440
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 89.8
41% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 160
23% 167 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.27% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 12.1
8% 11 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.27%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS300M120C 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 51 42 5 4.4 8.2 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.1% Below average
Read 214
Write 204
Mixed 204
SusWrite 28.2
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 14.5
83% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 1.7
10% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
333GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 57 45 6 6.1 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 98.3
Write 102
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 31.1
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM5242(BM5342,BM5642) Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM5242(BM5342,BM5642)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $151
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback