EVGA 151-HE-E999

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 151-HE-E999  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 05:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 97
2-Core 194
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 654
57% 483 Pts
64-Core 1,015
63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 86.5
52% 70.1 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 44.7
46% 58.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 340 348 374 371 355 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 294
Mixed 283
SusWrite 346
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 36.8
130% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 153
153% 250 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 32GB
2133, 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 34.3
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19.2
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 151-HE-E999 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: EVGA 151-HE-E999

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback