Acer Z5WAE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Z5WAE  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Larne
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 02:22
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Memory 31.9
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 51.8
23% 37.2 Pts
4-Core 82.2
8-Core 91.6
11% 86.9 Pts
64-Core 93.5
6% 93.5 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Acer(1025 0865) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 2.9
0% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 56 49 54 56 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 94.3
Write 90.8
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 52.6
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
86% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.5
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 244
16% 244 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z5WAE Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Z5WAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback