Lenovo 82MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 19:10
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 166
2-Core 299
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 728
80% 631 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 27.3
17% 24.6 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 0.2
9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SSSTC CL1-4D256 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS262 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 277 372 227 226 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,592
Write 327
Mixed 309
SusWrite 274
135% 625 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 7
135% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 236
229% 377 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 137%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC4U1-B8BS Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 16.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82MD Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback