HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 15:49
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Memory 26.2
1-Core 15.3
2-Core 27.4
15% 23 Pts
4-Core 39.9
8-Core 40
5% 40 Pts
64-Core 38.1
2% 38.1 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CyberX 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 74 31 20 27 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
Read 378
Write 315
Mixed 270
SusWrite 56
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 9.7
49% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 82.5
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 26
35% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1777 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 278
14% 278 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback