Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JP
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 13:37
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 242
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 524
59% 464 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX330
Asus(1043 1F0F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 16.6
16% 19.2 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 16.7
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1286 1349 1391 1125 241 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,379
Write 1,536
Mixed 1,265
SusWrite 981
342% 1,540 MB/s
4K Read 75.7
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 101
351% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 412
376% 562 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 292%
Great: 290%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75
177GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 451 458 442 380 392 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 350
Mixed 357
SusWrite 426
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 43.6
144% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 336
253% 338 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 14.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 16.9
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback