Mustek6376 H110M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMustek6376 H110M-HD2  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H110M-HD2-CF
Memory16.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 09:36
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 269
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 744
73% 600 Pts
64-Core 735
46% 735 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 70.3
59% 72.8 fps
MRender 75.9
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 0.3
36% 50.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 240GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42051100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 42 60 52 57 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
63% Good
Read 451
Write 186
Mixed 291
SusWrite 66
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 31
113% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 25
48% 100 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63%
Great: 77%
External USB3.0 640GB
38GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 36.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 40.8
26% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Micron 8ATF2G64AZ-3G2F1 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HD2 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Mustek6376 H110M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback