PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140319 |
Uptime | 2.6 Days |
Run Date | Jul 25 '20 at 12:59 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
60%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 127 116 95 71 61 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
200GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 94 100 96 97 100 MB/s
|
72.5%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 161 158 165 168 MB/s
|
77.8%
Very good
|
|||
External USB3.0 640GB
582GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
695GB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 105 88 86 101 93 MB/s
|
60.1%
Good
|
|||
USB3.0 high speed 500GB
232GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 27 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
32.6%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 135x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 125x |
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 77x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 102x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 60x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 53x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |