Acer NG-G9-791-5998

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAcer NG-G9-791-5998  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger_SLS
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 04:33
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 179
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 342
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 105B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.37 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 9.3
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 51 52 52 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 400
Write 55.5
Mixed 104
SusWrite 51.4
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 17.6
85% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 83.6
65% 92.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 85%
Nvme GIGABYTE GP-GSM2 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 60.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1184 1151 266 170 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,004
Write 1,014
Mixed 1,001
SusWrite 517
199% 884 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 74.5
266% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 1,057
DQ Mixed 516
453% 652 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 186%
Great: 213%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
96GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 137 133 242 137 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.8% Below average
Read 183
Write 89.7
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 172
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 10.3
40% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 15.3
12% 16 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 85%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID 307a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 14 13 15 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
8.39% Terrible
Read 35.5
Write 6.8
Mixed 10.1
SusWrite 13.7
18% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.39%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF M471A5244CB0-CTD 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NG-G9-791-5998 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer NG-G9-791-5998

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback