HP Elite 7100 Microtower PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Elite 7100 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9Ch
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110301
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateOct 21 '17 at 11:03
Run Duration379 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 133
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 344
38% 301 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230
Device(1B0A 9044) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 2
5% 4.61 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 4.57
Splatting 4.04
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.3% Average
Read 254
Write 141
Mixed 145
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 18.8
76% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 72.1
DQ Mixed 40.9
53% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 114%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
51GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.8% Average
Read 268
Write 178
Mixed 138
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 5.18
53% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 7
42% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
64GB free
Firmware: HP64 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 100
Mixed 87.2
71% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.49
113% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 68%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Read 8.52
Write 3.86
Mixed 4.83
6% 5.74 MB/s
4K Read 3.56
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
14% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite 7100 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite 7100 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback