MSI MS-158K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 B5DD
MotherboardMSI MS-158K  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 10:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 309
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 844
90% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
MSI(1462 130E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.10.01.03
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 28.6
17% 33.7 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 20.5
16% 20 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 254 275 50 19 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49% Average
Read 118
Write 906
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 256
79% 343 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 2.4
53% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 396
282% 346 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 30
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 32.3
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-158K Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-158K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback