Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	431% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '22 at 01:45
Run Duration	336 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 78.9 1-Core 140 2-Core 277 89% 165 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 831 77% 644 Pts	64-Core 1,057 65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330 20,866 User benchmarks, average bench 86% PowerColor(148C 2413) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Lighting 89.9 Reflection 136 Parallax 170 73% 132 fps	MRender 200 Gravity 91.5 Splatting 159 123% 150 fps
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB 10,731 User benchmarks, average bench 376% 706GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3195 3289 3272 2452 1530 1536 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	431% Outstanding	Read 2,860 Write 3,202 Mixed 3,034 SusWrite 2,546 658% 2,911 MB/s	4K Read 77.1 4K Write 175 4K Mixed 106 346% 119 MB/s	DQ Read 1,260 DQ Write 1,123 DQ Mixed 1,168 882% 1,183 MB/s
Poor: 236% ↑ This bench: 431% Great: 477%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 465GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2280 627 632 631 629 631 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	277% Outstanding	Read 2,382 Write 2,309 Mixed 1,456 SusWrite 905 394% 1,763 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 63.4 225% 87.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,356 DQ Write 1233 DQ Mixed 1,258 954% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 277% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 133GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 443 454 451 455 257 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 450 Mixed 451 SusWrite 419 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 95.1 4K Mixed 55.3 184% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 199 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 129%
WD WD10S21X-24R1BT0-SSHD-8GB 1TB 17,076 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 5GB free Firmware: 03.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 50 75 64 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	32% Below average	Read 53.3 Write 51.2 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 57.8 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 59%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$105 8,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 154 155 154 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 157 Write 159 Mixed 77 SusWrite 153 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 100%
WD WD40EFZX-68AWUN0 4TB 1,814 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 186 189 189 187 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 207 Write 191 Mixed 102 SusWrite 187 126% 172 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.1 466% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 116%
WD easystore 264D 8TB 977 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 6TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 184 181 187 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 186 Mixed 131 SusWrite 186 232% 171 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 1.6 409% 5.13 MB/s	DQ Read 0.9 DQ Write 4.6 DQ Mixed 2.1 231% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 36.6 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.4 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 37.2 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,659x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,281x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,421x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,243x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,081x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,472x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,840x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	727x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,012

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16