Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 13:37
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
65% 118 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 368
42% 326 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.8.1
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
9.76% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 16.7
10% 13.5 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 11.1
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.76%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen06sm21ar512sdkm2 512GB 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 376 382 392 399 401 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 488
Write 378
Mixed 386
SusWrite 387
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 24.6
111% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 49
73% 136 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
445GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 89 101 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 70
Write 76.3
Mixed 99.4
SusWrite 96.8
64% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.2
134% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 23
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 21
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback