Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 07:48
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 170
2-Core 338
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,280
115% 972 Pts
64-Core 2,189
136% 2,189 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 8825) ≥ 4GB; asus tuf 3070
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 211
Parallax 200
184% 212 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 153%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1300 984 979 723 564 550 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,930
Write 2,164
Mixed 1,680
SusWrite 850
372% 1,656 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 78.1
282% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,348
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1,197
907% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 271%
Great: 297%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
216GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 399 409 408 407 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 490
Write 412
Mixed 395
SusWrite 408
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 24.6
127% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 38.2
67% 129 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 100%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
209GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 261 266 266 266 265 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 429
Mixed 364
SusWrite 286
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 46
161% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 217
164% 222 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 111%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
423GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 410 315 6.6 6.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 488
Write 415
Mixed 396
SusWrite 194
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 27.3
131% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 35.6
70% 140 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 79%
Great: 91%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
21GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 171 163 173 179 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 174
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 176
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
321% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
107GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 196 183 199 196 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 141
Write 138
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 195
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 2621 4TB
140GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 103 104 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 90
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 103
121% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.8
246% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate Portable 4TB
385GB free, PID 2344
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 75 76 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 41.8
Write 58.3
Mixed 51
SusWrite 73.8
81% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 58.8
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 44.4
141% 49.5 GB/s
SC Read 32.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 40.5
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback