Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory233.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181224
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 12:26
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2970WX-$1,383
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 639
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 3,068
190% 3,068 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1755 1414 1277 1050 1051 1044 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,808
Write 2,021
Mixed 1,644
SusWrite 1,265
380% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56
184% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 685
500% 658 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 236%
Great: 337%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
418GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 220 161 163 161 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 468
Write 454
Mixed 405
SusWrite 221
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 39.6
126% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 357
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
466GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 254 252 259 251 257 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 473
Write 285
Mixed 288
SusWrite 258
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 35.8
122% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 212
176% 259 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85%
Great: 117%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
978GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 4,221
Write 38.1
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 20.5
226% 1,090 MB/s
4K Read 366
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 5.2
563% 125 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 319%
Great: 496%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
170GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 236 239 243 236 242 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 320
Write 209
Mixed 161
SusWrite 240
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 22.2
93% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 56.3
102% 206 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 85%
Viper M.2 VPN100 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 3,591
Write 38.4
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 20
194% 931 MB/s
4K Read 364
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 5.1
559% 124 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 293%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A4G43MB1-CTD 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 29
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 28.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback