HP p6-2370eg

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP p6-2370eg  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 15:26
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 166
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 497
51% 411 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 32.4
26% 32.8 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 22.6
24% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 209 224 235 238 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.4% Good
Read 258
Write 245
Mixed 196
SusWrite 221
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 32
112% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 172
136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 114 142 145 143 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 107
Write 127
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 137
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.7
219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 157 157 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71% Very good
Read 94.7
Write 146
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 153
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2370eg Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2370eg

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback