Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L755 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '22 at 14:34
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 150 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 371 39% 314 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M 9,032 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FC50) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	2.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 1 2% 2.67 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 3 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.4% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SDM6Q240 240GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0121A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 199 309 404 404 406 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 308 Write 401 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 352 63% 279 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 0.5 57% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 60.8 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 0.6 47% 106 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	264x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	112x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	55x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	45x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	40x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	25x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188