Acer Predator PH315-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL QX60_TLS
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 14:09
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 161
2-Core 305
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 877
89% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,327
82% 1,327 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1547) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 112
Parallax 115
88% 112 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 88.8
Splatting 81.6
80% 100 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00BT7 512GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7302Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1088 1082 1084 1094 1093 1085 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,975
Write 3,603
Mixed 2,039
SusWrite 1,088
544% 2,426 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 70.2
274% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,062
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 920
697% 942 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 311%
Great: 388%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4S320038G22-BHYD 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 30.1
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 18.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-54 Builds (Compare 3,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback