Acer Predator PH315-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL QX60_TLS
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 12:35
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 69.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 304
88% 169 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 868
86% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,261
78% 1,261 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1547) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.9% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 142
Parallax 111
93% 122 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 93.4
Splatting 84.2
83% 105 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00BT7 512GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7302Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1041 1052 1059 1056 1053 1051 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,296
Write 1,283
Mixed 1,044
SusWrite 1,052
315% 1,419 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 61.9
230% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 881
674% 914 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 268%
Great: 388%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4S320038G22-BHYD 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 29.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 18.2
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-54 Builds (Compare 3,739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback