Acer TravelMate P214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer TravelMate P214  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Timpani_TL
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 23:51
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 292
89% 169 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 589
64% 510 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1490) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 16
Parallax 18.8
11% 16.2 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 14
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 296 279 281 291 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,121
Write 1,107
Mixed 1,050
SusWrite 307
201% 896 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 68.9
234% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 689
538% 741 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 170%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 13.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P214 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback