Intel NUC11PABi5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11PAHi5
MotherboardIntel NUC11PABi5  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 15:37
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 660
70% 557 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 3004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 20
Parallax 24.7
16% 21.6 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 0.1
12% 16.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$33
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 61 79 74 26 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 430
Write 377
Mixed 356
SusWrite 110
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 22.9
102% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 40.9
91% 183 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD4BGSA8C-32N220A 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 15.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC11PABi5 Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC11PABi5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback