Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory53.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 01:22
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 140
2-Core 277
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 870
83% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,096
68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 253
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 220
206% 158 fps
MRender 254
Gravity 158
Splatting 129
141% 180 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 167%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 334 344 311 368 279 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 441
Mixed 376
SusWrite 334
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 48.6
168% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 214
163% 221 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 117%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
496GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2255 2283 2274 2278 1133 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 1,745
Write 2,179
Mixed 1,932
SusWrite 1752
430% 1,902 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 88.7
300% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,344
DQ Write 1,081
DQ Mixed 1,194
899% 1,207 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 324%
Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
260GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 132 139 150 138 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 134
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 141
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 112%
Generic- SD/MMC 128GB
43GB free, PID 8468
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 76 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45% Average
Read 91.4
Write 82.2
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 79.3
108% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 5.3
347% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
Generic- Micro SD/M2 32GB
23GB free, PID 8468
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.2
Write 69.5
Mixed 38.8
76% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.7
216% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 41.1
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback