Gigabyte GA-H97M-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150920
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 15:43
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 212
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 408
53% 400 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.2% Very good
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 97.2
Parallax 88.9
79% 94.3 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 89.3
Splatting 76.8
71% 88 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-240 240GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H181026
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 20 23 23 24 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 468
Write 449
Mixed 375
SusWrite 34.2
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 43.6
171% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 83
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 133
118% 170 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 94%
Xraydisk 480GB SSD 480GB
384GB free
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 219 221 220 227 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.2% Good
Read 252
Write 231
Mixed 218
SusWrite 210
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 13.2
119% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 16.3
55% 121 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 92%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
235GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 96 96 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 85.4
Write 96.3
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 94.5
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
32GB free
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 70 65 68 72 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 74.6
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 67.2
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8N6TNSQR Kingston 99P5474-013.A00LF 0423 Team-Elite-1600 Kingston 99P5474-055.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-DS3P Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-DS3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback