Acer Predator G5910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G5910
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 10:08
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 169
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 356
46% 349 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.71% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 8.9
6% 7.2 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.4
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 350 100 158 92 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 457
Write 334
Mixed 366
SusWrite 199
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 30.6
110% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 219
190% 278 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 213 210 215 216 216 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
911GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 104 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 124
Write 122
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 104
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 70%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 111 112 113 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 119
Write 109
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 111
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 83%
WD Elements 1042 1.5TB
524GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 87.5
Write 87.6
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 82.2
104% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 99U5471-020.A00LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G5910 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $498
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback