Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 09:07
Run Duration2151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 203
86% 148 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 931
86% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.8% Poor
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 30
24% 30.5 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 21.9
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP M700 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: Q1017A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 412 414 420 416 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 403
Mixed 377
SusWrite 414
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 31.1
152% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 44.5
68% 130 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 98%
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8542105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 938 929 1715 1763 1558 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,369
Write 1,690
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 1,166
300% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 29.2
181% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 495
444% 668 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 212%
Great: 244%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
709GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 133 134 134 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 140
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 132
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.6
246% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 79%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
602GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 157 157 156 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 142
Write 142
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 157
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOY D4U1632160D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3533 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 36.6
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 35.3
108% 37.9 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback