Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 07:25
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 198
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 304
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 6510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.5% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 125
Parallax 122
105% 125 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 102
88% 110 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 12 21 23 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4,259
Write 28
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 13.1
225% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 72.2
4K Mixed 1.3
167% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
558GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 141 139 139 142 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 56.8
Write 87.6
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 141
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 106%
Seagate Ultra Slim PL 1TB
111GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 33
Write 34
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 18.4
18% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
926GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 30
Write 28.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 19
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZN F4-3200C16-16GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZN 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 28.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 27.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback