Ditecma LP14125

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDitecma LP14125  (all builds)
MotherboardDitecma LP14125
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201005
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 23:17
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 183
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 379
43% 336 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 7.7
5% 25.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 512GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1444 392 438 487 397 429 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,368
Write 1,765
Mixed 1,352
SusWrite 598
286% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 69.6
232% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 765
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 691
505% 664 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 193%
Great: 267%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
766GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 89 105 113 100 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 134
Write 114
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 104
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
214% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS6266.M4FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 19.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LP14125 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Ditecma LP14125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback