G7-2011 X79

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

Motherboard	G7-2011 X79 (all builds)
Memory	15.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180625
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '22 at 20:05
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 1,768 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 68.1 1-Core 58.5 2-Core 127 50% 84.6 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 364 34% 282 Pts	64-Core 436 27% 436 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.3% Outstanding	Lighting 111 Reflection 100 Parallax 113 90% 108 fps	MRender 164 Gravity 95.3 Splatting 94.3 93% 118 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 512G 512GB 2,522 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 214 216 212 219 195 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.6% Above average	Read 237 Write 222 Mixed 225 SusWrite 212 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 22.1 77% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 186 140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 99%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 258GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 116 114 120 121 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 107 Write 123 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 115 66% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 87%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154 24,344 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 420GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 98.8 Mixed 37.2 51% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70BH1- 3x8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 18.1 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.1 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: G7-2011 X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2630 v2IntelBench 67%, 1,838 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	2x

SSD
512G 512GBHs-ssd-e100Bench 74%, 2,522 samples	2x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $54Bench 191%, 5,987 samples	2x
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70BH1- 3x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9 samples	3x
HMT42GR7BMR4C 1x16GBHynixBench 22%, 31 samples	2x
99U5471-052.A 2x8GBKingstonBench 38%, 126 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16