Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 159 71% 117 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 487 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 033E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 14.6 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 12.9 12% 13.7 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 9.5 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Geil ZENITH 480G R3 480GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 398GB free (System drive) Firmware: 907XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 41 84 84 84 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 464 Write 399 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 116 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 0.8 35% 9.7 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 15.4 DQ Mixed 0.1 18% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U7EFR8C-PB 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 19.6 60% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	497x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	184x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	57x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16