TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 800G5H/800G5S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemSamsung 800G5H/800G5S  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT800G5S-XD71A
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170823
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 06:09
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 183
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 454
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 70.3%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Sanyo(144D C790) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.5% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 61
49% 63.6 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 61.8
51% 63 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 49.5%
 Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70K1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 316 322 322 321 282 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,666
Write 1,154
Mixed 750
SusWrite 332
216% 975 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 69
235% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 742
608% 871 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑
This bench: 201%
 Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
193GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 130 133 140 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 64.3
Write 88.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 135
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 57.2%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 73.3%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 800G5H/800G5S Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 800G5H/800G5S

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples97x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples3x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples51x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples40x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples9x
SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples12x
MZVLW128HEGR-000 128GBSamsungBench 166%, 199 samples6x
MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 74%, 4,569 samples5x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples46x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples11x
SF4641G8CK8IEGKSBG 2x8GBSmartBench 72%, 48 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback