Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 01:09
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 262
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 778
77% 631 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.68% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 8.5
6% 8.5 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.6
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.68%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290
Zotac(19DA C530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3520 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 60.9
52% 61.5 fps
MRender 80.3
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 55.8
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76
543GB free
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 679 641 643 595 509 649 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 750
Write 657
Mixed 669
SusWrite 619
152% 674 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 87.2
282% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 1,217
794% 928 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 191%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$113
775GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 65 72 74 76 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 474
Write 73
Mixed 119
SusWrite 72.7
40% 185 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 24.1
102% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 85.4
DQ Mixed 107
87% 127 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 128%
Kingston SVP180S264G 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: CJRA0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 187 187 180 164 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 202
Write 161
Mixed 106
SusWrite 181
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 25.6
92% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 28.3
25% 36 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Shark Gaming 1TB SSD
673GB free
Firmware: T0519A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 13 12 13 15 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 485
Write 416
Mixed 390
SusWrite 65.7
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 30.3
132% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 51.6
84% 156 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 24.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback