Acer Mandolin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemAcer Mandolin  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Grumpy_PK
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 15:02
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 29.1
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 128
41% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.1
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1114 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 212 213 214 213 217 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 529
Write 495
Mixed 489
SusWrite 231
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 38.6
131% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 545
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 438
333% 453 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown J641GU42J9266NN Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 13.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.6
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mandolin Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Mandolin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback