Amazon g4dn.4xlarge

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAmazon g4dn.4xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 07:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 179
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 723
65% 550 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.9% Very good
Lighting 83.7
Reflection 108
Parallax 94.9
68% 95.7 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 95.9
79% 97 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 225GB
209GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 310 310 310 310 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,040
Write 544
Mixed 949
SusWrite 315
159% 712 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 42
151% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 554
398% 512 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 129%
Great: 137%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 322GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 124 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.4% Very good
Read 126
Write 187
Mixed 136
SusWrite 127
107% 144 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 5.6
1,022% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 48.8
MC Mixed 40.2
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 106%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical g4dn.4xlarge Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Amazon g4dn.4xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback