Atari VCS 800 Black Walnut

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAtari VCS 800 Black Walnut  (all builds)
MotherboardATARI VCS
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 06:39
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.7% Below average
Memory 43.6
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 106
40% 69 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 101
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 8.3
4% 7.23 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6
Splatting 11.7
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ROG ESD-S1C 1TB
721GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 242 220 226 250 285 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46% Average
Read 166
Write 81.4
Mixed 190
SusWrite 236
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 18.8
56% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 81
83% 136 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 46%
Great: 90%
Seagate BACKUP+ 500GB
450GB free
Firmware: 0143
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 94.3
67% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 62%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB
17GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.5
Write 88.5
Mixed 61.4
100% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.2
66% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S1ME-4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 11.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VCS 800 Black Walnut Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Atari VCS 800 Black Walnut

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback