MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 16:42
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 205
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 721
68% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.5% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 95.6
Parallax 91.9
79% 94.7 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 88.4
Splatting 76.8
75% 94.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 945 843 839 846 847 834 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,554
Write 2,116
Mixed 1,847
SusWrite 859
412% 1,844 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 82.1
268% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 521
DQ Mixed 646
490% 667 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 269%
Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
657GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 121 130 127 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60% Good
Read 85.4
Write 116
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 124
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60%
Great: 106%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
608GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 78 76 76 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 79
Write 78.4
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 76.4
57% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 63%
SEMC SD CCR-80 2GB
2GB free, PID e134
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 3.2
8% 7.28 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
82% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESB.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 34.9
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 31.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 102%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback