MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 10:30
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 206
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 710
67% 557 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.2% Very good
Lighting 93.9
Reflection 95.1
Parallax 89.4
76% 92.8 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 87.6
Splatting 75.8
70% 86.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 989 857 834 847 827 741 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2468
Write 2,237
Mixed 1799
SusWrite 849
411% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 72.3
236% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 411
DQ Mixed 620
455% 606 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 251%
Great: 346%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
657GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 127 132 128 124 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 77.2
Write 111
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 124
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 106%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
608GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 78 78 77 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 88
Write 51.8
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 76.6
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 63%
SEMC SD CCR-80 2GB
2GB free, PID e134
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Read 18.1
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3.2
8% 7.88 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
87% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESB.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 34.7
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 30.2
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 101%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,051
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback