MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '22 at 06:07
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	77%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 56.8 1-Core 82.1 2-Core 201 60% 113 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 346 40% 308 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 57.4 Reflection 57.2 Parallax 78.3 47% 64.3 fps	MRender 58.1 Gravity 63.7 Splatting 42.8 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2256G 256GB 4,105 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 95 146 92 114 88 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.1% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 28.4 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 147 13% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 0% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 98%
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1011 128GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 35GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 127 114 98 114 113 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 422 Write 412 Mixed 312 SusWrite 124 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 41 144% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 241 186% 254 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMN16GX4M2Z3200C16 2x8GB 785 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 25.7 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 33.6 SC Mixed 23.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	44x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	40x
Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $99Bench 68%, 93,718 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	24x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	8x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $162

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16