Pcware IPMH510G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcware IPMH510G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH510G
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 16:54
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 155
2-Core 310
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 910
94% 758 Pts
64-Core 1,122
69% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 52.9
47% 56.4 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 47.4
44% 54.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BTSDA-240G-535 240GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 444 446 449 450 448 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 446
Mixed 438
SusWrite 447
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 34.9
170% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 51.6
95% 185 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 110%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WSW18U8EVD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 28
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 29.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH510G Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Pcware IPMH510G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback