HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80A4
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 15:57
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 126
53% 89 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 199
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80A4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 6.5
4% 7.23 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0827A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 169 8.2 13 15 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 417
Write 324
Mixed 345
SusWrite 101
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
16% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 99%
Kingston DataTraveler 111 32GB
23GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 11 11 11 11 8.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 66.5
Write 27.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 10
29% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 15%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
36GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 9 10 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 85.1
Write 12.9
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 10.5
33% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
70% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 30%
Generic External 320GB
238GB free, PID 1240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 32.1
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 37
44% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback