Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X10SLH-F/X10SLM+-F
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140424
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '22 at 00:09
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 185 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 330 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 50.6 Reflection 58.7 Parallax 53.6 41% 54.3 fps	MRender 61.2 Gravity 54.2 Splatting 46.8 43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SV300S37A120G 240GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 24 24 46 23 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 185 Write 168 Mixed 161 SusWrite 33.8 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 11.7 58% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 98.1 91% 140 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 40GB free Firmware: 10RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 348 362 363 358 355 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 321 Write 372 Mixed 262 SusWrite 349 74% 326 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 17.4 101% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 107 121% 203 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 86%
SABRENT SD 256GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 237GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 79 82 82 80 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 88.3 Write 81.2 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 79.2 104% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 4.2 272% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF 4x8GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 17.1 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 18 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $104Bench 69%, 5,273 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro 400NvidiaBench 2%, 1,018 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK128MBF 128GBBench 82%, 465 samples	1x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 58%, 225 samples	1x
9965432-082.A00LF 9965525-138.A00LF 9965432-082.A00LF 9965525-138.A00LF 24GBKingstonBench 60%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $131

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16