Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 164 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 433 44% 358 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2067) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.2% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 101 Parallax 108 90% 107 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 98.7 Splatting 92.9 87% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 614GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 203 221 192 210 190 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 228 Write 176 Mixed 166 SusWrite 199 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 5.4 32% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 49.9 DQ Mixed 57.6 51% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 207GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 237 238 233 240 239 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.3% Good	Read 241 Write 228 Mixed 217 SusWrite 236 52% 230 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 33.7 103% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 197 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 215 214 212 213 217 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston HP698650-154-KEF M378B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.2% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 14.4 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	9x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16