HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8393
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 20:40
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 201
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 557
56% 453 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8393) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Lighting 93.2
Reflection 123
Parallax 95.6
76% 104 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 94.9
Splatting 104
81% 97.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 784 453 461 469 466 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,336
Write 1,672
Mixed 1,153
SusWrite 586
319% 1,437 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 67.8
230% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,139
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 947
713% 962 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 244%
Great: 332%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 195 192 210 211 266 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 340
Write 199
Mixed 205
SusWrite 220
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 26
106% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 205
168% 238 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22.7
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 18.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback