Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 16:59
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 304
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 996
97% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,488
92% 1,488 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 221
Parallax 216
199% 227 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 165
Splatting 132
145% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 165%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2020 1976 1976 1984 1973 1961 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,332
Write 2,159
Mixed 2,149
SusWrite 1,982
486% 2,155 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 71.1
233% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 220
253% 464 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 313%
Great: 435%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
892GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 413 390 390 330 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 507
Write 423
Mixed 329
SusWrite 375
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 29.3
103% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 177
131% 176 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 115%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 404 413 417 396 416 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 392
Write 417
Mixed 373
SusWrite 411
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 38.2
141% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 124
104% 155 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W642GU42J2320NH 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37.3
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 41.3
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 96%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback