Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 11:40
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 290
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 917
88% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,484
92% 1,484 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 208
Parallax 203
186% 213 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 158
Splatting 131
138% 176 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 156%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1801 1909 1729 1821 1740 1500 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,774
Write 1503
Mixed 1,554
SusWrite 1,750
371% 1,645 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 48.6
170% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 993
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 253
267% 467 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 256%
Great: 435%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
924GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 382 364 387 357 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 147
Write 336
Mixed 105
SusWrite 360
54% 237 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 29
85% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 187
141% 192 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 115%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
2TB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 398 365 383 369 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 304
Write 356
Mixed 298
SusWrite 373
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 35.1
112% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 120
106% 162 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W642GU42J2320NH 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 35.6
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 32.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 89%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback