Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120815
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '17 at 10:22
Run Duration495 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 370
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
XFX(1682 6000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.58 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0911
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 23
Mixed 20.8
18% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.28
4K Mixed 0.46
251% 2.54 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
733GB free
Firmware: 050B
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 20.8
Mixed 22.3
17% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.19
53% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 68%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
547GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 150
Write 144
Mixed 11.5
73% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.17
80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
240GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 99.8
Mixed 39.3
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.23
75% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 65%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V54OA73A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 33.6
Write 43.5
Mixed 20.5
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.23
72% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
931GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 25.2
Mixed 26.7
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 19%
Seagate External Drive 320GB
292GB free, PID 0503
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 25
Mixed 26.2
34% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.38
60% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 18%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
256GB free, PID a075
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 24.3
Write 25.5
Mixed 3.47
21% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.44
167% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 24%
Seagate External Drive 320GB
175GB free, PID 0503
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 24.9
Mixed 25.9
33% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.26
50% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron V01D3L84GB52852813 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback