Lenovo 90A3A5P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90A3A5P  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 05 '22 at 19:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 169
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 318
44% 323 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
24.5% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 28.2
26% 31.7 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 26.1
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 224 236 234 240 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.4% Good
Read 254
Write 235
Mixed 218
SusWrite 228
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 27.3
96% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 147
124% 180 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
427GB free
Firmware: CC56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 174 176 175 176 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 146
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 174
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 0194 SH564128FH8N6TNSQG 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90A3A5P Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90A3A5P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback